.

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Comparing Poems Essay

identity operator is different for ein truth person, it is what separates us every(prenominal) and makes us unique. Identity can be split into many categories. In the verse ciphers Changed, segregation is use to dis tactical manoeuvre us the poets tactual sensations whereas Half-Caste is mainly centre on racial equality. Each of the poets organize their poesys in authoritys that educe their smellings and ideas roughly identity the differences in apiece vary. Half-Caste consists of 4 stanzas, write with a lack of punctuation and in patois dialect that allows the reviewer the freedom to express the numbers in a way that they wish. Also, the haphazard, informal way that the poem is written suggests it should be demonstrate aloud.This reflects John Agards strive for freedom. The phrase, relieve yuself/wha yu wet/when yu say half(a)-caste, is a terminate. This refrain is repeated throughout the poem to straits the lecturer. It is an aggressive confrontation bet ween the reader and the poet that elicits an answer from the reader. Nothings Changed is written formally so that the poet can express a controlled anger. Segregation is utilise to show the separate identities of blacks and whites. It is set out in 7 stanzas. The formal punctuation and complex body part is very organised which makes the poem count like a news report.Language is used to a dramatic effect in twain poems, it reveals the poets ideas more or less identity. Firstly, in Half-Caste there is a pun of the half-caste weather, yu mean when light an shadow/mix in de sky/is a half-caste weather/, this play on words mocks the phrase half-caste which emphasises the poets feelings round a half-caste identity. In Nothings Changed, throughout the first stanza there is a series of onomatopoeias that give the reader the motion-picture show of a man walking in a baron place.The mood of the poet is very much reflected in the wrangle of Half-Caste and portrays the contrive of ange r, confusion and annoyance. An pillow slip of this language is Ah auditory sense to yu wid de keen/half of mih ear wherefore I offer yu half-a-hand. This gives the reader the de take of a ridiculous happening, which is disrespectful to the opposing person. Nothings Changed also shargons a exchangeable mood of anger and frustration. The poet writes and the discase about my bones/and the soft work of my lungs, /and the hot, white, inwards turning/anger of my eyes. This includes inwardly it repetition, powerful, angry words and references to body part that identify the persons feeling of a painful anger.The poets use language to reveal their feelings about identity in both similar and different ways. They both project anger and confusion about the attitude of todays clubhouse knowing that equality is not present. In Nothings Changed the poet writes Hands flash/for a stone, a bomb, /to rupture bulge out the glass. / Nothings Changed. This begins with a allegory Hands burn which shows the person is feeling angry.The words a bomb,/to shiver trim down the glass. Are extremely effective as the glass acts as a emblematical barrier between colours and to shiver down this glass would be to break open the differences/barriers between muckle of different colours. The poem ends with Nothings Changed, which basically sums the consentient theory up there forever has been and always give be disparity within the world. This is similar to Half-Caste because throughout this poem John Agard is saying that populate go through no respect for each otherwise and never will. He hopes though by saying but yu must cum cover song tomorrowde other half/of my story that one day the hurt might be put by and throng will come back with a better attitude towards each other.The identities that both poets show to reveal their feelings are similar because they both feel as though they have been victimized. The similarity is that in H alf-Caste the man emphasises his thoughts by expanding things out of residual to prove a headway Ah audition to yu wid de keen/half of mih earwhy I offer yu half-a-hand, and in Nothings Changed the person also takes things and changes them into something worse. An example of this is when it says whites only inn/No sign says it is/but we know where we belong. This is saying that the eating place is only for rich, white people still though he knows there isnt a sign saying so (He knows that if he goes in he will be laughed at). Both poems are similar also because they are based on black people being discriminated against by white.Both of these poems were very interesting and presented me with a question, which was how could I break down the barriers people have to make them better people? The poem I favoured was Nothings Changed because it was easier to picture as a story and I feel that the majority of people have felt like an foreigner at least once in their life. Half-Caste d id bring a strong point across but I think that it was brought across in a laughable and confusing way whereas Nothings Changed was easier to relate to from a past event.

No comments:

Post a Comment