The Impeachment of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton :: Politics Political

Impeachment is the ultiomate punishment for a professorship. It is a long and complicated r protrude to removing a public official from office. The Constitutional process Article II, section 4 specifies the procedures to be used to remove a public official from office(CNN/all(a) Politics). The constitution states that and president found immoral for bribery, treason, or other high school crimes and misdemeanors. There has been a long debate on what should be considered a high crime. Different people in the House share diverse views. Ultimately it is up to the Hose to decide to drop the charges or march on the investigation. If the public official is found guilty a two thirds volume vote from the Senate is necessary. The most recent president to face an impeachment hearing was street arab Clinton. A previous case involving Richard Nixon, Watergate, was held in 1974. Rather than facing an superfluity with impeachment Nixon chose to resign in disgrace.Both cases were very much s imilar soon enough different. In the Watergate scandal many of Nixons dirty tactics were learned, including assorted lists of enemies,a summate of which became targets of IRS tax audits, wiretapping, political sabotage, burglary, blackballing, and smear campaigns(Geriouese). Similarly, as Clintons case unfolded, the scandal appeared to involve more than just a sexual assault. It was clear that the Republicans were out to get former President Clinton, when the Whitewater case emerged. Republicans were desperate to find Clinton guilty of covering up financial impropriety in his Arkansa invenvestments prior to fair president. When speacial prosecutor Robert Fiske Jr. turned up no evidence, Republicans demanded his removal. Kenneth Starr was appointed the position. He began an open-ended inquiry into every corner of Clintons life. Clinton was ultimetly found not guilty.The first major set back of President Bill Clinton arose from a series of events following the filing of a lawsuit on whitethorn 6, 1994, by Paula Jones in the United States regularize Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas(Starr). Ms. Jones alleged violations of her federal civil rights in 1991 by President Clinton when he was governor of Arkansas and she was an Arkansas state employee. According to the her allegations, Governor Clinton invited Ms. Jones to his hotel fashion where he made a sexual advance that she rejected. Clintons lawyers tried to get the caes to rest until his term as president was over. The Supreme Court decide against the recommendation and the court proceeded.