Explain Advantages and Disadvantages of the Process of Amending the Constitution

Explain advantages and disadvantages of the play of amending the piece 15 attach There change of amending the US character is a considerable process with lots of checks and balances created by the founding fathers this was to limit radical and frequent amendments. The prototypal part of the process is proposing an amendment this can be done in dickens ways, firstly by having two-thirds of both houses of theUnited States Congress jeer to the design, or by anational conventionassembled at the request of thelegislaturesof at least two-thirds of thestates agreeing to the proposal.To have a proposed amendment become part of the US constitution the proposed amendment needs to ratified, by having either ? of the states (38 states) agree to ratify the proposal or by holding state ratifying conventions in ? of the states, however this method has except been used once.One advantage of the process of amending the constitution is that it protects the constitution from frequent potpou rri to do with popular opinion, it means that to amend the constitution the amendment has to be just and needed at not something to be taken lightly, this can be shown by the fact that the constitution has only been amended 27 time which shows change is possible but not too easy that it changes the diachronic values that America was built upon, helps control one party controlling power.This is an advantage as it means that when a party comes into power (e. g. republicans) they cannot go and make lots of amendments that benefit them or are in their opinion, as the house of representatives usually as around 50/50 republican democrats proportion and you need 2/3 to have a proposal accepted. The system is democratic as 38/50 must agree which means its fair and reduces the chance of lots of unnecessary changes.One Disadvantage is that the process is time consuming which means that if an amendment is popular with the public e. g. banning guns collect to increased gun crime then it ma y be rejected by republicans which means it a no, however this was the point when the constitution was created, and was by design made difficult to amend. However some would argue that its so hard to amend that it cannot move with the modern times freely.Another disadvantage is that because of the difficulties of amending the constitution it has led to the supreme court assuming the role, this is when the supreme court rules on a case that something is unconstitutional which means that local governments can decide whether to enforce their decisions. In an extreme case if amendment proposals are uninterruptedly beingness rejected then a new constitution may offset printing off to create these new amendments in a separate constitution wiping out the existing one.In conclusion the process of amending the constitution is a long and tedious one but it makes sure that an amendment has to be supported by a large percentage and something that should be taken seriously, this means that in that respect is not lots of amendments which could jeopardise the historic values of the American constitution, and in like manner make the nation less stable as there is constant change which could confuse people. Lastly the process of amending the constitution is confusing and foreclose but without it America could be changed radically very quickly.